Re: [cpx] not intuitive, at all. (cpx)

["Stormer's Cgi-Archive" <stormer@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jonathan,

Ok, it sucks.   But my points were contructive.  (try to see beyond the 
"dark matter")

=)

James

Stormer's Cgi-Archive
http://www.stormer.org



On 12/6/2004 12:39:09 PM, cpx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> So, James, why do you not just tell us how you REALLY feel about CPX?  ;)
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004,
> Stormer's Cgi-Archive wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Well cpx looks nice, but it's
> simply "not" intuitive at all.   Now,
> I'm
> > pretty good at navigating programs and such and for me, well, I "can" 
> > figure
> > it out.  However, allowing end users to "administer" their own email, 
> > well,
> > it's
> flat out HARD.   Oh, I can set them up, no problem.  But having them go
>
> > to "UserList" add an end user, blah, then go to add email addresses...
>
> >
>
> > sheesh, viaverio, you should have just paid Mark Sharkey for his PRO and
>
>
> > developed that MUCH further.   imanPRO blows this cpx away.  (as it
> currently
>
> > stands) All I can say is.. the test vps2 I ordered to play with cpx on
> is
>
> > going to be removed. (I consider it waisted money)
> I've done all the testing
> > I need on it.   Maybe when the full program is developed and 
> > released...?
> > who knows.  It needs a LOT of improvement.
> >
> > Flat out 

======================================================================
This is <cpx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>      <http://www.groupmail.org/lists/cpx/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).