Just to help them understand a bit better, let me try to clarify something. When you say, not intuitive, I assume that you mean the layout of things and where to find what you want to do quickly. Correct? Would you suggest some kind of task shortcuts, other than what they have, or a different menu system, or something else altogether?
Regards, Jonathan On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Stormer's Cgi-Archive wrote:
Jonathan,Ok, it sucks. But my points were contructive. (try to see beyond the "dark matter")=) James Stormer's Cgi-Archive http://www.stormer.org On 12/6/2004 12:39:09 PM, cpx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:So, James, why do you not just tell us how you REALLY feel about CPX? ;) Jonathan On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Stormer's Cgi-Archive wrote: > Hello, > > Well cpx looks nice, but it's simply "not" intuitive at all. Now, I'm> pretty good at navigating programs and such and for me, well, I "can" > figure > it out. However, allowing end users to "administer" their own email, > well,> it's flat out HARD. Oh, I can set them up, no problem. But having them go > to "UserList" add an end user, blah, then go to add email addresses... > > sheesh, viaverio, you should have just paid Mark Sharkey for his PRO and > developed that MUCH further. imanPRO blows this cpx away. (as it currently > stands) All I can say is.. the test vps2 I ordered to play with cpx on is > going to be removed. (I consider it waisted money) I've done all the testing> I need on it. Maybe when the full program is developed and > released...?> who knows. It needs a LOT of improvement. >> Flat out====================================================================== This is <cpx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.groupmail.org/lists/cpx/> Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
====================================================================== This is <cpx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.groupmail.org/lists/cpx/> Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).